The Catholic Church Abuse Crisis

What can anyone say? Those of us who are Catholic and true believers are sick over this. Those of us who are not Catholic and are true believers are also sick over this. In fact there are very good atheists who are sick over this.

Those who are anti-Catholic are using it for purposes of propaganda (a term ironically related to the church, by the way).

These abuses did not happen because the Catholic church is evil. They happened because men are evil. Because evil men with unnatural lusts will seek out positions where they will be trusted and have greater access to potential victims.

I was reading an article on Yahoo! News about Pope Benedict XVI's latest remarks about sins of the church. And down in the comments was someone calling him or herself Christian who was posting incorrect scripture quotes for the purpose of condemning the Catholic Church. Now I don't think Christian is trying to mislead anyone. I think he/she really believes all of the things he/she is posting. I also think he is wrong.

Apologies to Baptists and others, but when people like "Christian" start throwing out the term saved (as in when I was/got saved) I get a bit leery. If you're going to define salvation as an event, it should be when Jesus died on the cross for our sins, spent three days in hell for us, and was resurrected. People talking about the day they got saved calls to mind the idea of a utopia that does not exist on this earth.

You know what? The Bible does not talk about having that kind of once-in-a-lifetime breakthrough. Jesus never said anything about it. So I'm not afraid to say that I do not have one experience in my life that fits the description of "Christian's" salvation.

My faith has always been here. I struggle every day. Turning from sin is not a one-time thing. You have to live your faith all the time. I believe. At some point I suppose I made a decision to believe, but it's not one I remember making. It doesn't make me less of a Christian.

And I'm not going to Hell because I don't fit neatly into that spiritual box. The only one who can tell me I'm going to Hell is Jesus, on Judgement Day.

Getting back to the point...there are many men who will have to answer to Jesus on Judgement Day for the innocent lives that were damaged. Not only those who were abusers, but those who failed to stop the abuse. And there are other churches where this has happened. Other denominations have pedophiles hiding amongst their clergy and their members.

I have personal connection to this kind of outrage. I have a sister who was abused, but not by any church official. Evil knows no denomination, no labels, no boundaries.

Evil will not be defeated by press coverage, or public outcry. But evil will be defeated by the hand of God, when the time is right. And those who cause the innocent to stumble will be punished. There will be no hiding. God goes where even the media cannot. He knows the secrets of those who have kept them thus far; those who may never be found out by our world. He will dispense the necessary justice. Only then will we know true peace.

Crackpot claiming to be Jesus visits Orlando.

Have you heard about this? http://www.local6.com/news/13265407/detail.html

First problem with this guy: reincarnation is not supported by Scripture. The entire concept of reincarnation belies the sanctity of the soul's trials and temptations and the Judgement of all who ever lived.

Second problem: his followers are tattooing themselves with the numbers "666." The mark of the beast. These people clearly do not know Scripture. Followers of Jesus would not get "666" tattooed on their bodies.

Why is it that people who have access to the Word of God, the knowledge that could prevent their being misled by such obvious charlatans, refuse to arm themselves with that knowledge? The Bible is printed in nearly every language on Earth. Anyone who can read, can get it. But they don't.

Comments are welcome, they always are, but I'd really like to know what others think of this.

My God's peace be with you.

The War in Iraq, Part 2

As promised, I am here to explain why we were set up to invade Iraq based on phony intelligence.

The simple fact is the reason the evil forces of the world set up the US is that we are a Christian nation (whether the minority of non-religious like it or not) and a force for good in the world. We may not always get things right but we are a country that was founded by Christian men who were looking for a place to practice their religion without fear of recrimination. The bedrock of our society is Christian theology. All of our traditions and institutions have their basis in the Bible and the teachings of Christ.

So what's the big deal with that? Think like an evil emperor for a minute. If you're planning to set up the seat of power for Evil Incarnate on Earth, what's the first thing you do? Eliminate the opposition.

The Anti-Christ cannot rise to power as long as America is a leading force in the world. Even though our society (or at least our media) is now bogged down in immorality, symbolically we are still in the way. So Satan sets us up to lose all credibility in international politics by giving us bad information he knows we'll act on. He knows we'll act on it because of September 11, 2001 (also his work). Brilliant, isn't he? Too bad he has the end of the story backwards. God still wins.

So we're a step closer to Armageddon, and America will no longer be a world power. Personally I don't mind so much. I'm kind of hoping we won't be as embroiled in the worst of the happenings in Revelation. We can't escape entirely, after all the whole world will be fooled by the Anti-Christ, but at least we won't be leading the charge to put him into power.

If you've read my previous postings about the identities of the Beasts of Chapter 13, and you are following what's going on in Russia, you will see the synthesis between my beliefs and reality. More on that later...

Until next time, God bless you.

The War in Iraq, Part 1

I said I would cover current events, so here I tackle one of the most debated issues in America.

First I'd like to say that I don't buy that "we went to war for the oil" excuse. Not a single person who's used this line on me has been able to tell me where all that oil is that we supposedly went there to get. Iraq is an OPEC nation, so we don't have any greater access to their oil supply now than we did before. And if we did, gas prices would be much, much lower.

But I do think there were darker forces at work behind this whole thing. I now introduce the subject of the unholy trinity.

• Which three nations provided us with the bad intelligence that got us into the war? Answer: France, Russia, and Germany.
• Which three nations on the UN Security Council kicked up the biggest fuss before the unanimous vote approving the use of force? Answer: France, Russia, and Germany.
• And which three nations, despite having no troops on the ground there have benefitted greatly from lucrative contracts in post-Saddam Iraq? Answer: France, Russia, and Germany.

Conclusion: we were set up. They knew after 9/11 we were not going to sit back when there was a possibility that one of our longest-standing enemies--a man who allowed Al Qaida to operate training camps in his country, offered $25,000 to the family of any suicide bomber who killed Americans or Israelis, and basically issued an open invitation to bin Laden to crash at his place any time--was developing weapons we know he would use against us, or sell to the terrorists so they could use them against us.

Tune in next week as I explain why we were set up. Until then, God bless you.

But that's not in the Bible!

This week's subject, again a favorite of anti-Catholic argument, is the point that many things involved in the faith are not mentioned in the Bible. My first thought is: so what? Computers aren't in the Bible either, but you're on one, aren't you? But the subject deserves more consideration than that. So let's examine it (actually I mean me not us, since you're not typing).

Why would things that aren't in the Bible be part of worship? Because people like routine and traditions. The issue isn't really whether Catholic practices have a basis in scripture (and most of them do) but whether it's possible for something not mentioned in the Bible to contribute to a relationship with Jesus.

This is one of those "fine line" issues that Satan loves to play with. I am by no means an expert, but I pray for guidance each time I post. I have faith that God can work through me. You can choose to agree with me or not. Your decision. But I feel that I've been given information that should be shared in the interests of arresting division between believers, who need to stand together now more than ever.

First let's pick just one Catholic thing that's not in the Bible. Saints for example. Not that there aren't saints in the Bible (after all, the KJV has the gospels according to St. Matthew, St. Mark, St. Luke, and St. John) but arguably the Catholic Church has a lot more on their list.

Ok, is there anything wrong with designating certain people as saints? I don't think so, but I don't think only those who get canonization are saints. There's no way a system run by men will recognize all of them. It's not humanly possible. Which is why as far as eternity goes, the decision is up to God, not men. Still I don't think there's anything specifically wrong or sinful about it. And anyone who doesn't make the cut will still get a Heavenly reward anyway so it's not like they'd complain. Compared to the glories of Heaven, what is having your name on a list made by men?


What is the point of designating saints anyway? Giving people an example of others who have lived and followed Christ. Showing that there are different ways to serve. Helping to remind us that others have faced trials, and it is possible to resist temptation and live by faith.

Does it take people away from Jesus? Not if the saints have been recognized for their devotion to Christ. Only in twisting the point could it even be possible. Those who have made their lives examples of Christ's love cannot but serve as a testament to the goodness and mercy of God. The only way anyone can believe that the Catholic tradition of sainthood takes people away from Jesus is if they want to believe it.

The same way the only people who think the film The Passion of the Christ is anti-semitic were those who went into the movie believing that, and refused to consider otherwise. The evidence they saw supported the conclusions they had made before seeing it, because that is the way they wanted it. "There is none so blind as he who will not see."

Could the "sainthood" thing be used by Satan? Of course. He'll use anything. But a thourough knowledge of scripture as well as knowledge of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, can make void his efforts.

Which reminds me. Another reason the Catholic Church isn't the harlot of Revelation (hey, this is the main focus of my blog until I run through the reasons for my belief): Satan is so incredibly anti-Catholic that it's not possible. Think about it. The most evil, corrupt, and depraved portray the Church as a backward and archaic institution for the sole reason that it defends the lessons of the Holy Scriptures against the modern secular way of life. As I pointed out in my last post, Jesus said "A house divided against itself cannot stand." So why would Satan be working so hard to bring down the Church if it was his baby to begin with?

Actually many of the arguments against the Catholic Church fail to take into consideration the changes implented with Vatican II. The entire point of Vatican II was to bring the church back in line with the Scriptures because it had fallen away. Yes, there have been many mistakes made, but as Jesus said "Let he who has not sinned cast the first stone."

I can't say what I'll write about next week, because I don't usually plan it out in advance. I let the Holy Spirit dictate the topic. But I will, at some point be going through the book of Revelation in depth. It will take many posts, but it will be done. That's really more the point of this blog than even defending my religion. There are dangerous things going on in the world and so many people do not see it. We are moving toward Armageddon (did I spell that right?). It is not something to fear, but people should be made aware of it. The days in which more sheep can be brought into the fold grow short. It is my hope that this blog will help to spread the Good News to others who might not hear it otherwise.

May God's peace be with you.

Back to the Harlot, Part 1

Message of January 25, 2007: "Dear children! Put Sacred Scripture in a visible place in your family and read it. In this way, you will come to know prayer with the heart and your thoughts will be on God. Do not forget that you are passing like a flower in a field, which is visible from afar but disappears in a moment. Little children, leave a sign of goodness and love wherever you pass and God will bless you with an abundance of His blessing. Thank you for having responded to my call."

One favorite argument of anti-Catholic and anti-Marian believers is that the Marian Apparitions are actually the work of Satan. I have several reasons for disagreeing with this assessment.

The above quote is from the Blessed Mother's monthly visit to Medjugorje. Now the last thing Satan would want anyone to do is study Scripture and make it a central part of family life. Aside from the fact that family harmony is not something he likes, the more you know the Scripture the less likely you are to be fooled by his minions who misquote it. Satan knows the Scripture inside and out, and it would make his job a lot easier if no person on earth could say the same. Half-truths are some of his greatest weapons. He will use verses from Scripture, but he will always twist them. So the main point of Mary's message of January 25, 2007 is antithetical to Satan's purpose. As Jesus himself said when he was accused of working for the devil: "A house divded against itself cannot stand."

This is not an isloated point. If you go back through the transcripts of Marian Apparitions you will see that the Blessed Mother's statements are always in perfect harmony with the Holy Scriptures.

Another common lie told about the mother of our Savior, is that in the apparitions she asks people to pray to her and worship her. Nothing could be further from the truth. The only times she requests our prayers she also tells us to pray to God and/or Jesus. Not once in a single apparition has she claimed any power or privelege. Not once has she claimed to be anything other than a messenger. Her humility is well known from Scripture itself, and those who claim that the apparitions are the work of Satan have not heard or read her messages.

So where does that idea come from? Where did anyone get the notion that the apparitions might be of evil origin? If you visit Jack Chick's website you will find a great deal of information about the Babylonians and their "queen of heaven" Semiramis. This information is absolutely true. Mr. Chick mistakenly assumes that the apparitions of the Blessed Mother are merely a newer incarnation of Semiramis and an attempt to turn the faithful away from Jesus. (see the paragraph directly above for my refutation of that point)

Mr. Chick claims (though in fairness I must point out that he did not originate the idea) that the Catholic Church uses the Blessed Mother as the new Semiramis. Adherents to this idea claim that the aparitions of the Blessed Mother were planned back during the days of Babylon and are merely the continuation of Satan's attempts back then to lure followers away from true Christianity. Though in the days of Babylon Christianity did not yet exist, so at the time it would have been for the purpose of luring people away from Judaism.

I find it odd that not a single person who believes this theory of Marian Apparitions being a millenia old Satanic plot has ever thought that they might have it backwards. Why do they fail to see that Satan thought up Semiramis all those centuries ago for the exact purpose of trying to discredit the mother of our Lord Jesus Christ?

Other than furthering division between believers and fomenting disharmony, what does the entire debate do for us? Does it change the fact that Jesus is our Savior and Satan is his rival? Does it change what will happen in the world? Does the argument give us anything but more argument? Nonbelievers don't care, it's only the faithful who are remotely interested in this subject. Why is it that so many people don't see that the entire point is to divide us from each other and keep us so busy arguing about it that Satan can do his work better and with less interference. How many people could be saved with the time and energy expended as a result of this plot to destroy Christian unity and discredit not only the mother of our Lord, but also the Catholic Church?

Mr. Chick's website also contains the words of a former Jesuit priest who has now passed on to be with Jesus. He affirmed the truth of the Semiramis theory, and said it had been told to him by a fellow Jesuit or Jesuits. I sincerely believe that this man was telling the truth. I also sincerely believe the person or persons who told him these "secrets of the Church" were lying to him. I have no trouble believing that Satan has infiltrated the Jesuits, a society of which most people know nothing, even most Catholics don't know much about the Jesuits. My mother has always said that Satan does his best work in the churches. And that's ALL churches, not just the Catholic Church.

I will close this post with Luke 1: 42-55, which begins with Elisabeth's salutation to her cousin Mary.

"And she spake out with a loud voice, and said, Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb. And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me? For, lo, as soon as the voice of thy salutation souded in mine ears, the babe leaped in my womb for joy.

And blessed is she that believed: for there shall be a performance of those things which were told her from the Lord.

And Mary said, My soul doth magnify the Lord, And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my saviour. For he hath regarded the low estate of his handmaiden: for, behold, from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed. For he that is mighty hath done to me great things; and holy is his name. And his mercy is on them that fear him from generation to generation. He hath shewed strength with his arm; he hath scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts. He hath put down the mighty from their seats, and exalted them of low degree. He hath filled the hungry with good things, and the rich he has sent empty away. He hath holpen his servant Israel in remembrance of his mercy; As he spake to our fathers, to Abraham, and to his seed forever."

Until I post again, may God's peace be with you.

What's wrong with Communism, Part 2

Another fundamental problem with Communism goes along well with a quote by Aristotle. "The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal."

And what does this have to do with Communism? Communism attempts to make unequal things equal. Sharing all things equally between all people. In theory if everyone owns everything and everyone has what they need, there will be no envy, no theft, no murder. Utopia, in short.

The problem, as Aristotle knew, is that the world is not an equal or fair place. Inequality is part of the natural order of the world. It was made this way for a reason. Of course I believe that all men are created equal, and are basically the same. But it is part of life that some will prosper and some will not. Jesus said we would always have the poor with us. Why? Because poverty is part of this earthly experience. Suffering is the domain of the human world. Only in Heaven are all things equal.

This doesn't mean there's anything wrong with trying to help people in need, or fight against injustice. It doesn't mean, as at least one person has said, that you shouldn't help the poor. In fact, it's how we react and respond to the injustices of the world that show us who we really are. It's a test of our faith, our humanity, and our ability to rise above our humanity.

But the man who promises to end unfairness and injustice and inequality throughout the world will not be of God. And I believe he will use Communism for this purpose. Communism and the UN's Universal Human Rights Declaration of 1948. After all, who would suspect a man who is not coming up with any groundbreaking ideas, but merely reminding us of the words of others?

Until I write again, God bless you.